Once again the Scriptures--which summon the believer to the Crown, as insistently as the unbeliever to the Cross--present this dual truth with crystal clearness. Paul opens one little masterpiece of revelation (Phil. 3:4-15) with a supreme hopelessness. What is it? The one man who came nearest to reaching God through his own goodness proved to be the chief of sinners. Ponder Paul's incomparable assets: no soul, before or since, ever held up to the face of God a hand filled with such exquisite pearls. Circumcised, stamped as God's from infancy; of the stock of Israel, with a blood-right to salvation; of the tribe of Benjamin- a tribe which never broke away; a Hebrew of Hebrews- a full blooded Jew to the furthest generation back; a Pharisee- intensely orthodox; persecuting the church- on fire for God's law; in the Law blameless- obedient in jot and tittle. No man ever came so near to winning life through what he was and what he did. "If any other man" (of any age or race or clime) "thinketh to have confidence in the flesh, I yet more" Paul towers over all legalists for ever. But a sudden and awful discovery blasted his prospects. "I was alive [in my own eyes] apart from law once: but when the commandment 'thou shalt not lust' came [to his own conscience] sin revived [sprang to life again] and I died [or
saw myself a dead man] and the commandment, which was unto life, this I found to be unto death" (Romans 7:9) But what had his inward vision revealed? A corpse before God. With Paul's failure, the whole world lapses into hopeless despair. There next appears a supreme righteousness. Whose? Not Paul's; because he had discovered, with Isaiah, that "we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags" (Isa. 64:6). He now discovers that what he could not do, Christ did; that what he could not be, Christ was; and
that Christ had done it, and been it, in order to take his place (2 Cor. 5:21). He instantly drops his own righteousness, and seizes Christ's. He exchanges his own pearls for one priceless, flawless gem. "I do count them but dung, that I may gain Christ, and be found in him not having a righteousness
of mine own, but that [righteousness] which is through faith in Christ." There yet remains a supreme uncertainty. Here are startling words... "Brethren, I count not myself yet to have apprehended but I press on." (Phil. 3:13) Not apprehended what? "If by any means I may attain unto the resurrection from the dead."(Phil. 3:11) It it most evident that Paul had some special resurrection in view, even the first: and to share in that he was straining every nerve. But press on to what? "Towards the goal unto the prize of the high calling." "IF" [conditional] "by any means" [hazardous] "I may attain unto" [may implying only a possibility i.e., perhaps, maybe] "the resurrection" [selective] "that which is from among the dead" [exclusive]; it would be difficult to cram a text with more uncertainty that Paul just did! As the context suggests, the first resurrection; any reference here to a merely ethical resurrection is wholly out of the question. That Paul is speaking of bodily resurrection is clear from the closing verse of this very chapter: "we wait for a Saviour who shall fashion a new body of our humiliation, that it may be conformed to the body of his glory." Every passage that refers to resurrection FROM the dead (Mark 9:10, Luke 10:35, Romans 1:4, Revelation 10:4) refers to physical resurrection. Of his resurrection at the end of the world, when all without exception will surely be raised, he could have no possible doubt. What sense then can this passage have, if it represents him as labouring and suffering merely in order to attain to a resurrection, and as holding this up to view as unattainable unless he should arrive at a high degree of Christian perfection? On the other hand, let us suppose a first resurrection to be appointed as a special reward of high attainments in Christian virtue, and all seems to be plain and easy. Paul cannot be speaking of regeneration here because he had already attained that upon his conversion on the plain of Damascus. Salvation can never be insecure, but equally true, the Prize can never be assumed until it is won. Why? (1) Because it is a prize. If the prize be given on faith without works, it is no more a prize. The insecurity of the chief of apostles binds insecurity of reward for ever on the Church of God. "Not that I have already obtained, or am already made perfect; but I press on, if so be that I may apprehend" : That is, the apprehension is indissolubly linked with the
perfection. "Let US therefore as many as be perfect, be thus minded". "SEEK YE FIRST the kingdom of God" (Matthew 6:33) is our Lords words to disciples already in the kingdom mystery. How? Labour? But I thought salvation was free? I thought it was the gift of grace? And it is! (3) "This one thing I do". All his missionary ardour, all his thirst for souls, all his toil for the churches, are bent before this overmastering passion of his soul; because the running tracks for the prize God has laid through these channels of holy service; and
today's toil is the measure of tomorrow's glory. "The first resurrection is a reward for obedience rendered after the acceptance of salvation, and Paul knew not the standard which God had fixed in His own purpose" (G. H. Pember) "The Kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and MEN OF VIOLENCE take it by force" (Matthew
11:12)
Next Part of the Series: The Two Justifications Within This Series:
Christian Responsibility |
The Millennial Kingdom | |
|
|