 |
Here are a dozen natural phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary
idea that the universe is billions of years old. The numbers I list
below in bold print (often millions of years) are maximum possible
ages set by each process, not the actual ages. The numbers in italics
are the ages required by evolutionary theory for each item. The
point is that the maximum possible ages are always much less than the
required evolutionary ages, while the biblical age (6,000 to 10,000
years) always fits comfortably within the maximum possible ages. Thus
the following items are evidence against the evolutionary time scale and
for the biblical time scale.
Much
more young-world
evidence exists, but I have chosen these items for brevity and
simplicity. Some of the items on this list can be reconciled with an old
universe only by making a series of improbable and unproven assumptions;
others can fit in only with a young universe. The list starts with
distant astronomic phenomena and works its way down to earth, ending
with everyday facts.
-
Galaxies
wind themselves up too fast
The stars of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, rotate about the
galactic center with different speeds, the inner ones rotating
faster than the outer ones. The observed rotation speeds are so fast
that if our galaxy were more than a few hundred million years
old, it would be a featureless disc of stars instead of its present
spiral shape.1
Yet our galaxy is supposed to be at least 10 billion years
old. Evolutionists call this ‘the winding-up dilemma’, which
they have known about for fifty years. They have devised many
theories to try to explain it, each one failing after a brief period
of popularity. The same ‘winding-up’ dilemma also applies to
other galaxies.
For the last few decades the favored attempt to resolve the dilemma
has been a complex theory called ‘density waves’.1
The theory has conceptual problems, has to be arbitrarily and very
finely tuned, and lately has been called into serious question by
the Hubble Space Telescope’s discovery of very detailed spiral
structure in the central hub of the ’Whirlpool’ galaxy, M51.2
-
Comets
disintegrate too quickly
According to evolutionary theory, comets are supposed to be the same
age as the solar system, about 5 billion years. Yet each time
a comet orbits close to the sun, it loses so much of its material
that it could not survive much longer than about 100,000 years.
Many comets have typical ages of 10,000 years.3
Evolutionists explain this discrepancy by assuming that (a) comets
come from an unobserved spherical ‘Oort cloud’ well beyond the
orbit of Pluto, (b) improbable gravitational interactions with
infrequently passing stars often knock comets into the solar system,
and (c) other improbable interactions with planets slow down the
incoming comets often enough to account for the hundreds of comets
observed.4 So far, none of these assumptions has been
substantiated either by observations or realistic calculations.
Lately, there has been much talk of the ‘Kuiper Belt’, a disc of
supposed comet sources lying in the plane of the solar system just
outside the orbit of Pluto. Even if some bodies of ice exist in that
location, they would not really solve the evolutionists’ problem,
since according to evolutionary theory the Kuiper Belt would quickly
become exhausted if there were no Oort cloud to supply it. [For more
information, see the detailed technical article Comets
and the Age of the Solar System]
-
Not
enough mud on the sea floor
Each year, water and winds erode about 25 billion tons of dirt and
rock from the continents and deposit it in the ocean.5
This material accumulates as loose sediment (i.e., mud) on the hard
basaltic (lava-formed) rock of the ocean floor. The average depth of
all the mud in the whole ocean, including the continental shelves,
is less than 400 meters.6
The main way known to remove the mud from the ocean floor is by
plate tectonic subduction. That is, sea floor slides slowly (a few
cm/year) beneath the continents, taking some sediment with it.
According to secular scientific literature, that process presently
removes only 1 billion tons per year. 6 As far as anyone
knows, the other 24 billion tons per year simply accumulate. At that
rate, erosion would deposit the present amount of sediment in less
than 12 million years.
Yet according to evolutionary theory, erosion and plate subduction
have been going on as long as the oceans have existed, an alleged 3
billion years. If that were so, the rates above imply that the
oceans would be massively choked with mud dozens of kilometers deep.
An alternative (creationist) explanation is that erosion from the
waters of the Genesis flood running off the continents deposited the
present amount of mud within a short time about 5000 years ago.
-
Not
enough sodium in the sea
Every year, river7and other sources9 dump over
450 million tons of sodium into the ocean. Only 27% of this sodium
manages to get back out of the sea each year.8,9 As far
as anyone knows, the remainder simply accumulates in the ocean. If
the sea had no sodium to start with, it would have accumulated its
present amount in less than 42 million years at today’s input and
output rates.9 This is much less than the evolutionary
age of the ocean, 3 billion years. The usual reply to this
discrepancy is that past sodium inputs must have been less and
outputs greater. However, calculations which are as generous as
possible to evolutionary scenarios still give a maximum age of only 62
million years9 Calculations10 for many
other sea water elements give much younger ages for the ocean. [See
also Salty
seas: Evidence for a young Earth]
-
The
earth’s magnetic field is decaying too fast.
The total energy stored in the earth’s magnetic field has steadily
decreased by a factor of 2.7 over the past 1000 years.11Evolutionary
theories explaining this rapid decrease, as well as how the earth
could have maintained its magnetic field for billions of years,
are very complex and inadequate.
A much better creationist theory exists. It is straightforward,
based on sound physics, and explains many features of the field: its
creation, rapid reversals during the Genesis flood, surface
intensity decreases and increases until the time of Christ,
and a steady decay since then.12 This theory matches
paleomagnetic, historic, and present data.13 The main
result is that the field’s total energy (not surface
intensity) has always decayed at least as fast as now. At that rate
the field could not be more than 10,000 years old.14
[See also The
Earth’s magnetic field: Evidence that the earth is young]
-
Many
strata are too tightly bent
In many mountainous areas, strata thousands of feet thick are bent
and folded into hairpin shapes. The conventional geologic time scale
says these formations were deeply buried and solidified for hundreds
of millions of years before they were bent. Yet the
folding occurred without cracking, with radii so small that the
entire formation had to be still wet and unsolidified when the
bending occurred. This implies that the folding occurred less
than thousands of years after deposition.15
-
Injected
sandstone shortens geologic ‘ages’
Strong geologic evidence16 exists that the Cambrian
Sawatch sandstone — formed an alleged 500 million years ago — of
the Ute Pass fault west of Colorado Springs was still unsolidified
when it was extruded up to the surface during the uplift of the
Rocky Mountains, allegedly 70 million years ago. It is very unlikely
that the sandstone would not solidify during the supposed 430
million years it was underground. Instead, it is likely that the
two geologic events were less than hundreds of years apart,
thus greatly shortening the geologic time scale.
-
Fossil
radioactivity shortens geologic ‘ages’ to a few years
Radiohalos are rings of color formed around microscopic bits of
radioactive minerals in rock crystals. They are fossil evidence of
radioactive decay.17 ‘Squashed’ Polonium-210
radiohalos indicate that Jurassic, Triassic, and Eocene formations
in the Colorado plateau were deposited within months of one another,
not hundreds of millions of years apart as required by the
conventional time scale18 ‘Orphan’ Polonium-218
radiohalos, having no evidence of their mother elements, imply
either instant creation or drastic changes in radioactivity decay
rates.19,20
-
Helium
in the wrong places
All naturally-occurring families of radioactive elements generate
helium as they decay. If such decay took place for billions of
years, as alleged by evolutionists, much helium should have found
its way into the earth’s atmosphere. The rate of loss of helium
from the atmosphere into space is calculable and small. Taking
that loss into account, the atmosphere today has only 0.05% of
the amount of helium it would have accumulated in 5 billion years.21
This means the atmosphere is much younger than the alleged
evolutionary age. A study published in the Journal of Geophysical
Research shows that helium produced by radioactive decay in
deep, hot rocks has not had time to escape. Though the rocks are
supposed to be over one billion years old, their large helium
retention suggests an age of only thousands of years.22
[See also Blowing
Old-Earth Belief Away: Helium gives evidence that the earth is young]
-
Not
enough stone age skeletons
Evolutionary anthropologists say that the stone age lasted for at
least 100,000 years, during which time the world population
of Neanderthal and Cro-magnon men was roughly constant, between 1
and 10 million. All that time they were burying their dead with
artefacts.23 By this scenario, they would have buried at
least 4 billion bodies.24 If the evolutionary time scale
is correct, buried bones should be able to last for much longer than
100,000 years, so many of the supposed 4 billion stone age skeletons
should still be around (and certainly the buried artefacts). Yet
only a few thousand have been found. This implies that the stone age
was much shorter than evolutionists think, a few hundred years
in many areas.
-
Agriculture
is too recent
The usual evolutionary picture has men existing as hunters and
gatherers for 100,000 years during the stone age before
discovering agriculture less than 10,000 years ago.23 Yet
the archaeological evidence shows that stone age men were as
intelligent as we are. It is very improbable that none of the 4
billion people mentioned in item 10 should discover that plants grow
from seeds. It is more likely that men were without agriculture less
than a few hundred years after the flood, if at all.24
-
History
is too short
According to evolutionists, stone age man existed for 100,000
years before beginning to make written records about 4000 to
5000 years ago. Prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made
beautiful cave paintings, and kept records of lunar phases.25
Why would he wait a thousand centuries before using the same skills
to record history? The biblical time scale is much more likely.24
References
-
Scheffler,
H. and H. Elsasser, Physics of the Galaxy and Interstellar Matter,
Springer-Verlag (1987) Berlin, pp. 352–353, 401–413.
-
D.
Zaritsky et al., Nature, July 22, 1993. Sky &
Telescope, December 1993, p. 10.
-
Steidl,
P.F., ‘Planets, comets, and asteroids’, Design and Origins in
Astronomy, pp. 73–106, G. Mulfinger, ed., Creation Research
Society Books (1983) 5093 Williamsport Dr., Norcross, GA 30092.
-
Whipple,
F.L., "Background of modern comet theory," Nature 263 (2
Sept 1976) 15.
-
Gordeyev,
V.V. et al., ‘The average chemical composition of
suspensions in the world’s rivers and the supply of sediments to
the ocean by streams’, Dockl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 238 (1980)
150.
-
Hay,
W.W., et al., ‘Mass/age distribution and composition of
sediments on the ocean floor and the global rate of subduction’,
Journal of Geophysical Research, 93, No B12 (10 December 1988)
14,933–14,940.
-
Maybeck,
M., ‘Concentrations des eaux fluviales en elements majeurs et
apports en solution aux oceans’, Rev. de Geol. Dyn. Geogr.
Phys. 21 (1979) 215.
-
Sayles,
F.L. and P.C. Mangelsdorf, ‘Cation-exchange characteristics of
Amazon River suspended sediment and its reaction with seawater’, Geochimica
et Cosmochimica Acta 41 (1979) 767.
-
Austin,
S.A. and D.R. Humphreys, ‘The sea’s missing salt: a dilemma for
evolutionists’, Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on
Creationism, Vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1991)
in press. Address, ref. 12.
-
Austin,
S.A., ‘Evolution: the oceans say no!’ ICR Impact No. 8
(Oct. 1973) Institute for Creation Research, address in ref. 21.
- Merrill, R.T.
and M. W. McElhinney, The Earth’s Magnetic Field , Academic
Press (1983) London, pp. 101–106.
-
Humphreys,
D.R., ‘Reversals of the earth’s magnetic field during the
Genesis flood’, Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. on
Creationism (Aug. 1986, Pittsburgh) Creation Science Fellowship
(1987) 362 Ashland Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15228, Vol. II, pp.
113–126.
-
Coe,
R.S., M. Prévot, and P. Camps, ‘New evidence for extraordinarily
rapid change of the geomagnetic field during a reversal’, Nature
374 (20 April 1995) pp. 687–92.
-
Humphreys,
D.R., ‘Physical mechanism for reversals of the earth’s magnetic
field during the flood’, Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. on
Creationism, Vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1991)
(ref. 12).
-
Austin,
S.A. and J.D. Morris, ‘Tight folds and clastic dikes as evidence
for rapid deposition and deformation of two very thick stratigraphic
sequences’, Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Creationism
Vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1986) pp.3–15.
Address in ref. 12.
-
ibid.,
pp. 11–12.
- Gentry, R.V.,
‘Radioactive halos’, Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23
(1973) 347–362.
-
Gentry,
R.V. et al., ‘Radiohalos in coalified wood: new evidence
relating to time of uranium introduction and coalification’, Science
194 (15 Oct. 1976) 315–318.
- Gentry, R. V.,
‘Radiohalos in a Radiochronological and cosmological
perspective’, Science 184 (5 Apr. 1974) 62–66.
- Gentry, R. V., Creation’s
Tiny Mystery, Earth Science Associates (1986) P.O. Box
12067, Knoxville, TN 37912-0067, pp. 23–37, 51–59, 61–62.
- Vardiman,
L. The
Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere: A Study of the Helium Flux through
the Atmosphere, Institute for Creation Research (1990)
P.O.Box 2667, El Cajon, CA 92021.
-
Gentry,
R. V. et al., ‘Differential helium retention in zircons:
implications for nuclear waste management’, Geophys. Res. Lett.
9 (Oct. 1982) 1129–1130. See also ref. 20, pp. 169–170.
-
Deevey,
E.S., ‘The human population’, Scientific American 203 (Sept.
1960) 194–204.
-
Marshak,
A., ‘Exploring the mind of Ice Age man’, Nat. Geog. 147
(Jan. 1975) 64–89.
-
Dritt,
J. O., ‘Man’s earliest beginnings: discrepancies in the
evolutionary timetable’, Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf.
on Creat., Vol. I., Creation Science Fellowship (1990)
pp. 73–78. Address, ref. 12. Creation Science Fellowship of New
Mexico, Inc. P.O. Box 10550, Albuquerque, NM 87184 DRH September,
1999
Article
from Answers in Genesis
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
 |